Despite Israeli Doubts, Serious Diplomacy Is the Best Option for Iran

By Kelsey Davenport

UN-General-Assembly-I_Horo-4-635x357

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu addresses the UN General Assembly on October 1, 2013.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu told the UN General Assembly today that Israel will “stand alone” in order to prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons. It is good that Prime Minister Netanyahu is prepared for that, because alone is where Israel is right now when it comes to policy on Iran’s nuclear program.

Prime Minister Netanyahu seems to have missed the readout on the positive progress made last week on the negotiations between six world powers, or the P5+1, and Iran over its controversial nuclear program; a meeting that Secretary Kerry described as “constructive” and different in tone and vision from Iran’s past positions. And Prime Minister Netanyahu does not seem to have been listening to President Obama’s speech to the UN General Assembly, where Obama acknowledged the right of the Iranian people to access nuclear energy, or to President Obama’s statement after his phone call with President Rouhani, when he said there is “a basis for resolution.”

In seeking to guard against a nuclear-armed Iran, Prime Minister Netanyahu is allowing the perfect to be the enemy of the good. Yes, Israel has legitimate security concerns and good reason to distrust Iran. But Israel’s security and Iran’s nuclear programs are not mutually exclusive, and it would be irresponsible not to give President Rouhani the chance to act on his assurances that Iran is not seeking nuclear weapons and willing to accept limits to its nuclear program. Iran can have a limited peaceful nuclear program that does not threaten the national security of Israel, the United States, or any other countries in the region.

Prime Minister Netanyahu may have been the last leader to address the General Assembly, but he should not have the last word on how to approach a deal with Iran. His prescription for moving forward – more sanctions backed up by a credible military threat and demands that Iran dismantle its nuclear program – will not solve the Iranian nuclear crisis,  it will result in a continuation of the status quo.

International efforts should not insist on dismantlement of Iran’s nuclear program, as Prime Minister Netanyahu calls for, but rather need to focus instead on crafting a proposal allowing Iran to continue nuclear activities, including enrichment, but in a limited program and under more stringent international safeguards.

Such a deal should include:

  • Limits on Iranian enrichment activities;
  • Limits on Iran’s stockpiles of enriched uranium that are tied to a realistic assessment of Iran’s needs;
  • Increased monitoring and verification by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), including the Additional Protocol and implementation of Code 3.1;
  • Cooperating with the IAEA’s investigations into past activities with possible military dimensions.

Focusing on verifiable limits on Iran’s nuclear program is a much more pragmatic and constructive approach than focusing on its dismantlement. And it coincides with past U.S. statements of policy. In testimony before House Foreign Affairs Committee in March 2011, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said that in the future, having assured the international community that it isn’t seeking nuclear weapons and that it is committed to greater transparency, the United States should recognize a limited Iranian enrichment program.

If Iran agrees to limitations, increased monitoring, and stringent verification, the international community will be able to detect any diversion from peaceful nuclear activities. And in return for these concessions, Tehran should be granted relief from sanctions imposed on Iran as a result of its nuclear activities. Meaningful sanctions relief will allow Rouhani to sell a deal at home that limits Iran’s nuclear program.

Prime Minister Netanyahu “will never acquiesce” to Iran’s acquisition of nuclear weapons; neither will the United States. The difference is that Washington is willing to give Rouhani a chance to back up his words with actions. Washington is ready to negotiate with Tehran, not demand that Iran capitulate. Negotiating this “win-win” deal on Iran’s controversial nuclear program won’t be easy or quick, but it’s possible if both sides are willing to be more flexible and transparent.

This entry was posted in Iran, Israel, Middle East, Non-proliferation, Nuclear Weapons, Regions and tagged , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Despite Israeli Doubts, Serious Diplomacy Is the Best Option for Iran

  1. It is important to keep the sanctions on until Iran abandons its nuclear weapons ambitions and improves it human rights record. Rouhani can start by immediately by releasing the 7 hostages taken in the Ashraf massacre. On September 1, Iraqi forces killed 52 residents of Camp Ashraf and took seven hostages. In this massacre, ordered by the religious fascism ruling Iran, the attackers’ shot unarmed people while their hands were tied behind their backs and they delivered coups de grace to the wounded lying on hospital beds (see video http://bit.ly/GzSmHj ) This is a great crime against humanity that should not go unheeded in silence and inaction, especially that the rest of Ashraf residents and 3,000 residents in Camp Liberty are threatened by similar massacres. All residents of Ashraf and Liberty, including the 52 that have been cold-bloodily murdered, are protected persons by the Fourth Geneva Convention and asylum-seekers with U.S. and UN responsible for their safety

  2. As long as Iran continues to pursue a nuclear weapons capability, build longer-range ballistic missiles, sponsor terrorism around the world and abuse human rights, the US should impose pressure on Iran to give diplomacy a chance to succeed. Regarding human rights, Rouhani can start by immediately releasing the 7 hostages taken in the Ashraf massacre. On September 1, Iraqi forces killed 52 residents of Camp Ashraf, and took seven hostages. In this massacre, ordered by the religious fascism ruling Iran, the attackers’ shot unarmed people while their hands were tied behind their backs and they delivered coups de grace to the wounded lying on hospital beds (video http://bit.ly/GzSmHj ). This is a great crime against humanity that should not go unheeded in silence and inaction. All residents of Ashraf and Liberty, including the 52 that have been cold-bloodedly murdered, are protected persons by the Fourth Geneva Convention and asylum-seekers with U.S. and UN responsible for their safety. , Iran needs to be held accountable and pressure shouldn’t be lifted simply based on promises, but on concrete action.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s