A Realistic, Meaningful Nuclear Deal With Iran Is Within Reach

EU foreign policy chief Catherine Ashton meets with Iranian Foreign Minister  Javad Zarif on Nov. 7,  before the start of the nuclear talks between Iran and the P5+1.  (FABRICE COFFRINI/AFP/GettyImages)

EU foreign policy chief Catherine Ashton meets with Iranian Foreign Minister Javad Zarif on Nov. 7, before the start of the nuclear talks between Iran and the P5+1. (FABRICE COFFRINI/AFP/GettyImages)

By Daryl G. Kimball and Kelsey Davenport

For nearly a decade, negotiators from United States and other major powers have sought but failed to reach a deal with Iran to guard against the possibility that Tehran may someday seek to build nuclear weapons.

Since the last major diplomatic opportunity to limit Iran’s program was squandered in 2005-06, Iran has increased its capacity to enrich uranium significantly — from less than 300 to more than 19,000 uranium centrifuge machines at two facilities — despite the imposition of increasingly tough international sanctions.

According to U.S. intelligence estimates, Iran is still more than a year away from amassing enough fissile material and building nuclear weapons if it chose to do so, but its capabilities are growing. Additional centrifuges could be brought online in the coming months, more efficient centrifuges could be put into operation, an a new heavy water reactor that will produce plutonium that could be used for nuclear weapons may be operational by late-2014.

Now is the time to finally secure a meaningful agreement to limit Iran’s nuclear capabilities on the basis of realistic and achievable goals.

Both sides are highly motivated to resolve the issue and the new Iranian negotiating team is exhibiting uncommon seriousness and pragmatism.

Within Striking Distance of  A “First Phase” Deal

After nearly two days of talks, the negotiators are now very close to reaching an  historic framework deal that will pause Iran’s nuclear progress in exchange for a partial and temporary lifting of certain sanctions. The foreign ministers of France, Germany, and the United Kingdom have flown to Geneva to join U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry and Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif, while the Russian and Chinese foreign ministers are said to be traveling to Geneva as well.

News reports indicate the scheduled Nov. 7-8 meetings will go into overtime and possibly conclude on Saturday, Nov. 9.

The deal under consideration would address the most immediate issues of proliferation concern and put “time on the clock” to negotiate a more permanent agreement that might lead to a significant reduction of Iran’s overall enrichment capacity.

Such an agreement would clearly be a win for U.S. and international security. Key elements likely include:

  • halting Iranian uranium enrichment to 20% levels;
  • converting existing 20% material to oxide or downblending the stockpile to lower enrichment levels;
  • freeze the introduction or operation of additional centrifuges (approx. 10,000 IR-1 machines are operational; 19,000 are installed);
  •  measures to reduce the proliferation potential of the Arak heavy water reactor, possibly including stopping construction work;
  • unspecified additional transparency measures, possibly implementation (but not ratification) of the additional protocol.

These measures track closely with the P5+1 proposal for Iranian actions put forward at the April 2013 talks in Almaty.

In exchange for these concrete steps, the P5+1 may be considering:

  • releasing Iranian assets tied up in other countries from oil sales;
  • waiving certain sanctions on trade with Iran in petro-chemicals, trade in gold and other precious metals just put into effect last July;
  • waiving the designation of Iran’s auto industry and access to aircraft parts as areas of “proliferation concern;” and
  • providing medical isotopes or fuel for the Tehran Research Reactor, which uses 20% enriched uranium fuel and produced medical isotopes.

A deal along these lines would provide time to quickly negotiate a more permanent, far-reaching agreement to reduce Iran’s capacity to produce material that could be used for nuclear weapons, put in place much more intrusive international inspections to guard against a secret bomb program, and further scale-back the oil and financial sanctions that are devastating Iran’s economy.

To secure a “final phase” agreement, the P5+1 need to recognize Iran’s right under the Article IV of the NPT to pursue peaceful nuclear activities under certain conditions. As Obama said in his Sept. 24 address to the United Nations, such recognition requires that Iran adequately and satisfactorily respond to the international community’s concern about the nature of its program.

To resolve those concerns, Iranian President Hassan Rouhani must follow through on his pledge for “greater transparency” by implementing the additional protocol and fully cooperating with the IAEA to resolve questions about suspected weapons-related experiments that may have been conducted over a decade ago. On Monday, IAEA Director-General Amano will meet with top Iranian officials in Tehran to try to reach agreement on the IAEA’s stalled investigation of past Iranian activities of “possible military dimensions.”

Deal Breakers?

Unfortunately some key players, including Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and some members of Congress, are demanding much more from the talks and risk getting nothing.

The Chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee Robert Menendez (D-NJ) apparently believes the P5+1 should hold out longer in the hope that with additional sanctions Iran will capitulate and agree to indefinitely  halt all enrichment work and dismantle its key nuclear facilities. Such an approach is naive and unrealistic.

Zero enrichment in Iran would be ideal from a nonproliferation standpoint and it might have been possible years ago when Iran’s program was far less advanced, but it is not attainable today.

Reality Check

Demanding the perfect deal and getting nothing is reckless and dangerous.

In the absence of a deal to limit Iran’s nuclear program, Iran will continue to increase its capacity to enrich uranium, possibly for nuclear weapons, and the risk of Israeli military strikes against Iran’s nuclear sites also will grow. Military strikes would only delay, not stop, Iran’s nuclear pursuits and would likely push Iran’s leaders to openly seek the bomb.

Members of Congress must understand that further sanctions will not halt or eliminate Iran’s nuclear weapons potential and will undermine the prospects of a deal to pause Iran’s nuclear progress.

Furthermore, most international and national sanctions will remain in place and continue to put tremendous pressure on Iran, its people and economy, until its leaders take the final steps necessary to give the international community confidence that it is not pursuing nuclear weapons. But Iran is not likely agree to limits on its nuclear program if there is no prospect for serious sanctions relief.

Members of Congress should be mindful that the United States is just one of the P5+1 negotiating team and if the United States Congress becomes the impediment to a common sense agreement to pause Iran’s nuclear progress in exchange for limited and temporary sanctions relief, international support for sanctions will erode.

And, if Congress undermines the negotiations by approving legislation mandating even tougher sanctions or that removes President’s authority to temporarily waive some existing sanctions in order to obtain concessions from Iran, Congress will be responsible for the likely outcome: improving Iranian nuclear capabilities and the growing threat of a military conflict.

The next few hours and days may represent the best chance to guard against a nuclear-armed Iran. We and a wide range of diplomatic experts agree that diplomacy is the best option on the table.

This entry was posted in Iran, Middle East, Non-proliferation, Nuclear Weapons, Regions and tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

7 Responses to A Realistic, Meaningful Nuclear Deal With Iran Is Within Reach

  1. NightOwl says:

    8/Nov/2013. 1/1
    . From: NightOwl

    On the proposed concession involving automobiles and aircraft parts. This should be narrowed, possibly more in this fashion.
    #1 All sales should be tracked from source to end user for a period of two years on afore mentioned chattel items.
    Failing to do this may be an Achilles heel!

  2. NightOwl says:

    1/1.
    From: NightOwl. 8/Nov/2013

    . We realize that the Iranian hand-picked panel, along with the people all the way to the Shah mean business this time. In good faith and in light of this fact, the government of Iran should agree to dismantle all 9,000 centrfuge machines,or immediately convert them,if cost effective, to Thorium-232. Also, after the afore mentioned 9,000 are up and running, the 10,000 should be converted to the same. Many countries,as I speak are, doing. Just this, going into Thorium-232, including China, Russia, and several other countries around the globe, if you don’t believe me, those of you at the Iran summit on the 7th and eighth look across the table and discuss this option.
    .

  3. You blithely assume that this dispute really has somethign to do with nukes when in fact that’s just a pretext and excuse for an entirely different policy of imposing regime-change on Iran, just as “WMDs in Iraq” was just a lie and pretext. The last thing the US wants is to resolve this dispute peacefully with Iran whilst leaving the regime in power. That’s why the US has dismissed, ignored or actively undermined numerous Iranian compromise proposals which included and even exceeded what you’ve written.

  4. Pingback: The World, Minus An Angry Israel, Moves Close to Deal With Iran | True World Intelligence News (TWIN)

  5. Ajax Lessome says:

    The Nuclear talks in Geneva must be built on proven steps to halt its nuclear weapons ambitions and not just promises. The US should not give Iran sanctions relief just because they say “Trust us.” Also, The US must include human rights issues as a condition of sanctions relief. This is the point where the US has maximum leverage over a regime wanting a deal badly. The US must not give something away without gaining something in return

  6. Pingback: Broaden the peace process with Iran | The Great Debate

  7. Pingback: NewsCenterd » Kerry: ‘we hope to narrow differences’ with Iran in nuclear talks

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s